<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Quick Comparison: Canon EOS 50D Versus Nikon D300</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/</link>
	<description>Welcome to my website.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quazi Ahmed Hussain</title>
		<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>Quazi Ahmed Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bui4ever.com/?p=1781#comment-2780</guid>
		<description>Canon made EOS 7D to compete in this niche.  Therefore, 50D should not be brought here for comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon made EOS 7D to compete in this niche.  Therefore, 50D should not be brought here for comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bui</title>
		<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bui4ever.com/?p=1781#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>I would select the D300 unless you have a lot of expensive glass from Canon already. Then invest in fast Nikon glass. Be sure to check-out my photography blog at http://blog.buiphotography.com for tips and tricks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would select the D300 unless you have a lot of expensive glass from Canon already. Then invest in fast Nikon glass. Be sure to check-out my photography blog at <a href="http://blog.buiphotography.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog.buiphotography.com</a> for tips and tricks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharris</title>
		<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bui4ever.com/?p=1781#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm I am upgrading from Canon Rebel xti &amp; can&#039;t decide on the 50d or d300. I shoot lots of a action... sports, wedding dances, kids, etc. &amp; on a budget</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm I am upgrading from Canon Rebel xti &amp; can&#8217;t decide on the 50d or d300. I shoot lots of a action&#8230; sports, wedding dances, kids, etc. &amp; on a budget</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PK Bhattacharyya</title>
		<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>PK Bhattacharyya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 05:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bui4ever.com/?p=1781#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>I had been using Canon EOS 1000D and just went up to Canon EOS 50D. As far as comparisons go, I feel its the eyes and concepts behind the camera that makes the difference. My experience with 50D is excellent and I&#039;d been able to get very good shots. Of course a digital darkroom processing (photoshop) is required for any camera. As it is, the image quality is so good that you need a little post processing. And we donot always shoot beyond ISO-1600. Hence its just the personal preference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been using Canon EOS 1000D and just went up to Canon EOS 50D. As far as comparisons go, I feel its the eyes and concepts behind the camera that makes the difference. My experience with 50D is excellent and I&#8217;d been able to get very good shots. Of course a digital darkroom processing (photoshop) is required for any camera. As it is, the image quality is so good that you need a little post processing. And we donot always shoot beyond ISO-1600. Hence its just the personal preference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quazi Ahmed Hussain</title>
		<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>Quazi Ahmed Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 06:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bui4ever.com/?p=1781#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>I bought the EOS 50D body last week for US$ 1,000.00 (one thousand dollars).  At this price point there cannot be anything better.   This equipment is very close to a pro body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the EOS 50D body last week for US$ 1,000.00 (one thousand dollars).  At this price point there cannot be anything better.   This equipment is very close to a pro body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remi</title>
		<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator>Remi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bui4ever.com/?p=1781#comment-2694</guid>
		<description>The higher resolution on the 50D makes it take noisy pictures. And the high ISO range is useless because again, it makes noise on the pictures.

If you want to compare the 50D and D300 all together, you should look at the end results from same lens and ISO setups to comparison and you will see that the D300 has less noise on its pictures</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The higher resolution on the 50D makes it take noisy pictures. And the high ISO range is useless because again, it makes noise on the pictures.</p>
<p>If you want to compare the 50D and D300 all together, you should look at the end results from same lens and ISO setups to comparison and you will see that the D300 has less noise on its pictures</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bui</title>
		<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-2474</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bui4ever.com/?p=1781#comment-2474</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s where Nikon consistently wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s where Nikon consistently wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bui</title>
		<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bui4ever.com/?p=1781#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>Quite a bit IMO. Imagine using an 85mm f/1.2 and you want to use it at 1.2 in bright conditions that might require 1/8000th of a shutter speed. With only 1/4000, you would have to stop down to 1.8? Might not be a whole lot of difference, but it&#039;s nice to have the availability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a bit IMO. Imagine using an 85mm f/1.2 and you want to use it at 1.2 in bright conditions that might require 1/8000th of a shutter speed. With only 1/4000, you would have to stop down to 1.8? Might not be a whole lot of difference, but it&#8217;s nice to have the availability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Leonard</title>
		<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-2470</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bui4ever.com/?p=1781#comment-2470</guid>
		<description>Question....   what kind of value will 1/4000 sec. shutter speed Vs 1/8000 make in terms of capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question&#8230;.   what kind of value will 1/4000 sec. shutter speed Vs 1/8000 make in terms of capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Quick Comparison: Canon EOS 50D Versus Nikon D300 &#124; Bui4Ever &#8230; &#124; Write What</title>
		<link>http://richbui.com/reviews/a-quick-comparison-canon-eos-50d-versus-nikon-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>A Quick Comparison: Canon EOS 50D Versus Nikon D300 &#124; Bui4Ever &#8230; &#124; Write What</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bui4ever.com/?p=1781#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest here: A Quick Comparison: Canon EOS 50D Versus Nikon D300 &#124; Bui4Ever &#8230;     Tagged as: canon, canon-eos-50d, d300, june-13, memory, nikon, Photography, sports No Comments  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest here: A Quick Comparison: Canon EOS 50D Versus Nikon D300 | Bui4Ever &#8230;     Tagged as: canon, canon-eos-50d, d300, june-13, memory, nikon, Photography, sports No Comments  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
